The principles and standards for land use regulations in South Korea's zoning system are ambiguous. Each zone permits a wide range of uses, and there are many exceptions, such as conditional use permits. This has led to conflicts between local residents and neighborhood facilities, such as restaurants, entertainment venues, and small-scale factories, due to issues like noise, odors, and parking.
Land use regulations have a significant impact on residents' daily lives, so it is crucial to establish zoning standards that reflect the concerns of local residents. These regulations should be determined based on two factors: the necessity of the proposed use in the city/region and the potential negative impact on the neighborhood.
This study aimed to understand residents' and experts' perspectives on the necessity and harmfulness of neighborhood facilities in residential areas through an awareness survey. The results confirmed that there was a greater discrepancy in perception between residents and experts regarding the harmfulness rather than the necessity of these facilities. Notably, the largest perceived disparity was observed for firearms stores and massage parlors. Based on the findings from the perception survey of residents and experts, this research proposes that certain uses within the second category of neighborhood facilities be classified and managed as third-category facilities, with limited permission. Additionally, it is important to explore various methods for gathering residents' opinions when making decisions about land use regulations.